Researchgate articles date

This agreement is an extension of a pilot article-sharing project that began in March Findings from the pilot were released in a white paper this week, which reports that approximately 50, articles were uploaded during the program.

researchgate articles date

Comparisons of article retrievals before and after they were shared on ResearchGate revealed that papers uploaded syndicated to the platform were downloaded between 0. And in a survey of close to authors, 90 percent reported viewing the partnership as a positive one. There is a notable change: During the pilot, users without subscriptions could access read-only versions of articles—this will no longer be possible. Instead, non-authorized users will have access to previews, which includes the first page of a paper, along with figures and metadata.

Authors will, however, be allowed to post preprints and other earlier versions of their articles, as long as licensing agreements permit them to be shared. Lisa Hinchliffe, a professor and the coordinator of information literacy services at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, notes that, in recent years, there has been a lot of discussion among both libraries and publishers about how to get content to readers.

A platform such as ResearchGate, she says, provides a new way of getting content to scholars. ResearchGate, which provides academics with a platform to share their articles, has a complicated relationship with scholarly publishers. The two publishers are also part of a group known as the Coalition for Responsible Sharingwhich has taken a stand against ResearchGate and issues takedown notices for articles identified as breaching copyright. Following this announcement, the Coalition for Responsible Sharing released a statement in which they said the cooperation proposals by ResearchGate did not address their concerns, and that copyright-infringing posts continued to be added to the site.

Most publishers have not taken a public stance on ResearchGate. Related Articles. What to Expect in the Publishing World in After battling publishing giants like Elsevier and Wiley, ResearchGate has finally succumbed to the allegations of copyright infringement issues. It has decided to restrict access to about 1. Publishers consider this verdict as a big win in their favor.

Let us learn some more details about ResearchGate and its copyright infringement issues. ResearchGate, a for-profit organization based in Berlin, Germany was founded in The website is one of the largest academic networks, allowing users to upload and share publications, book chapters, abstracts and so on.

Notably, ResearchGate receives funds via venture capitalists and science fundersincluding Goldman Sachs, Wellcome Trust charity, and Bill Gates himself. However, the site recently came under heavy scrutiny due to copyright infringement and breach of the Coalition for Responsible Sharing CRS. A recent study exemplified the magnitude of its infringement.

They expressed their concerns in a letter and sent it to ResearchGate. The letter requested ResearchGate to implement an automated regulation system for article copyright allocation. ResearchGate, however, rejected the suggestion. Since approximately 7 million copyrighted articles were freely available on ResearchGate, the approach seemed impractical.

In the underlying site-process, internet trawling for copyrighted papers proceeded to request researchers to upload modified articles to their ResearchGate portfolio. Clearly, the action warranted that ResearchGate would lose some of its data available online or pay for damages at the court proceedings.

In early November, yielding to the pressure from publishing giants, ResearchGate removed at least 1. Following months of conflict, the change ensures that papers will not be freely available online; instead, they can only be requested directly from authors. According to James Milne, spokesperson for the CRS, the decision to remove access to nearly 2 million articles marks a positive first step.

Additionally, a private sharing network may further enhance the security model of article-sharing policies. The dispute with ResearchGate follows a series of actions by academic publishers against several websites providing access to copyrighted articles. For instance, inElsevier sent takedown notices to Academia.

The immense popularity of copyright infringement highlights a bigger problem in the lack of affordable licensing agreements for academic publications. This long-term vision driven by The Electrochemical Society aims to bring about a transformative change in scholarly research communication. Further efforts are also underway to develop a novel, non-profit scholarly network known as ScholarlyHub. Historian Guy Geltner heads the non-profit scholarly project in an effort to create a portal for academic publications and networking.

In contrast to existing academic networks, impending projects will allow academics to own their data in a non-profit scholar-oriented community. What do you think about this move of ResearchGate? Do you agree with the CRS that this step is a great win towards copyright infringement?See what's new with book lending at the Internet Archive. Uploaded by Denis G Rancourt on June 5, Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass.

User icon An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up Log in. Web icon An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine Texts icon An illustration of an open book. Books Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video Audio icon An illustration of an audio speaker.

Audio Software icon An illustration of a 3. Software Images icon An illustration of two photographs. Images Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape Donate Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses.

EMBED for wordpress. Want more? Advanced embedding details, examples, and help! Reviewer: j. I am not going to give a full peer review. Consult for example the layperson's summary blog post by Erin Bromard. The author's point that RCTs have not supported mask wearing in general is correct. But no RCTs have been performed during a global pandemic. The author's assumption that 1 virion is an infectious dose is unsupported and leads to a false conclusion.

It is a shame that ResearchGate is censoring any type of research. I'm sorry Dr.

COVID-19 Research Articles Downloadable Database

Davis has had to come under this attack of his skills and abilities.Following positive feedback from the pilot phases, an expanded cooperation will see articles from all Springer Nature-owned journals syndicated to ResearchGate.

Springer Nature and ResearchGate have agreed to move forward with a long-term content syndication partnership starting in Q4 of This cooperation expands the scope of a two-phase pilot, which began in and has been evaluated in a white paper published today.

The partnership will enable content delivery of the version-of-record VoR articles directly to ResearchGate publication pages. Entitled users will be able to download and read the VoR of articles published in Springer journals from the past five years, and all Nature-branded research journals from the past three years, on ResearchGate; new articles will be made available on a daily basis as they are published.

Non-entitled users will be able to access an enhanced abstract of the article on ResearchGate, which includes metadata, abstract, figures and captions and the full first page. We are pleased that we can build on the success of the pilot phases, which showed numerous benefits to librarians, researchers and authors.

By bringing together two organisations with differing areas of expertise but similar goals, we strongly believe that we can support a seamless experience so that researchers can access the articles they need while maximising engagement with their peers.

Springer Nature and ResearchGate began the content-sharing pilot in response to a number of challenges, such as how to streamline multi-step authentication processes; the need to enable seamless remote access to content; and ways to support researchers in finding the most relevant and reliable research in context. The white paper, Researchers at the Centrereleased today indicates that the partnership brought multiple benefits that led to an enhanced user experience for authors, researchers and librarians.

We have learned a lot and we're excited to share the outcomes of this work through the white paper we are jointly releasing today. We hope it will encourage other actors in the scholarly communication ecosystem to join us to keep innovating to better support researchers, together.

For more than years, Springer Nature has been advancing discovery by providing the best possible service to the whole research community.

We help researchers uncover new ideas, support librarians and institutions with innovations in technology and data, and provide quality publishing support to societies.

researchgate articles date

We make sure all the research we publish is significant, robust and stands up to objective scrutiny, that it reaches all relevant audiences in the best possible format, and can be discovered, accessed, used, re-used and shared. Springer Nature is also a leading educational and professional publisher, providing quality content through a range of innovative platforms, products and services. Every day, around the globe, our imprints, books, journals and resources reach millions of people.

For more information, please visit springernature. ResearchGate is making research more efficient.


Over 18 million researchers use researchgate. Based in Berlin, ResearchGate was founded in It supports its activities by providing scientific recruitment and advertising. Its mission is to connect the world of science and make research open to all. DE Deutsch.

About Us Executive Team. Supervisory Board. Corporate Governance.

Springer Nature and ResearchGate Expand Content Sharing

Our Research Business. Our Education Business. Our Professional Business. Press Office. Overview About Us. Our Communities. Taking Responsibility Diversity and Inclusion. Employee Networks.ResearchGate is a European commercial social networking site for scientists and researchers [3] to share papers, ask and answer questions, and find collaborators.

How to Stay Up-To-Date on the Latest Research in Your Field

While reading articles does not require registration, people who wish to become site members need to have an email address at a recognized institution or to be manually confirmed as a published researcher in order to sign up for an account.

Users may also follow the activities of other users and engage in discussions with them. Users are also able to block interactions with other users. The site has been criticized for sending unsolicited email invitations to coauthors of the articles listed on the site that were written to appear as if the email messages were sent by the other coauthors of the articles a practice the site said it had discontinued as of November [9] and for automatically generating apparent profiles for non-users who have sometimes felt misrepresented by them.

As of [update]it has more than 15 million users, [1] with its largest user-bases coming from Europe and North America. ResearchGate publishes an author-level metric in the form of an "RG Score". RG score is not a citation impact measure. RG Scores have been reported to be correlated with existing author-level metrics, but have also been criticized as having questionable reliability and an unknown calculation methodology.

ResearchGate was founded in [12] by virologist Dr. The company's first round of funding, inwas led by the venture capital firm Benchmark. According to The New York Timesthe website began with few features, then was developed further based on input from scientists. The company grew from 12 employees in to in ResearchGate's competitors include Academia. A article in BusinessWeek reported that ResearchGate was a "potentially powerful link" in promoting innovation in developing countries by connecting scientists from those nations with their peers in industrialized nations.

It also said that ResearchGate had been involved in several notable cross-country collaborations between scientists that led to substantive developments. Academic reception of ResearchGate remains generally positive, as recent reviews of extant literature show an accepting audience with broad coverage of concepts. Although ResearchGate is used internationally, its uptake—as of —is uneven, with Brazil having particularly many users and China having few when compared to the number of publishing researchers.

A article in Times Higher Education reported that in a global survey of 20, people who use academic social networking sites, ResearchGate was the dominant network and was twice as popular as others: 61 percent of respondents who had published at least one paper had a ResearchGate profile.

In the context of the big deal cancellations by several library systems in the world, the wide usage of ResearchGate was credited as one of the factors which reduced the apparent value of the subscriptions to toll access resources. ResearchGate had been criticized by many users for its decision to not remove convicted sex offenders from its social networking site.

Many researchers deleted their account in protest as they refused to remove convicted child pornographer and registered sex offender in CanadaBen Levin as a user. ResearchGate has been criticized for emailing unsolicited invitations to the coauthors of its users. A study published by the Association for Information Systems in found that a dormant account on ResearchGate, using default settings, generated invitations to 38 people over a month period, and that the user profile was automatically attributed to more than publications.

Several studies have looked at the RG score, for which details about how it is calculated are not published. These studies concluded that the RG score was "intransparent and irreproducible", [18] criticized the way it incorporates the journal impact factor into the user score, and suggested that it should "not be considered in the evaluation of academics".

It was also found to be strongly positively correlated with Quacquarelli Symonds university rankings at the institutional level, but only weakly with Elsevier SciVal rankings of individual authors.

Nature also reported that "Some of the apparent profiles on the site are not owned by real people, but are created automatically — and incompletely — by scraping details of people's affiliations, publication records and PDFs, if available, from around the web.

That annoys researchers who do not want to be on the site, and who feel that the pages misrepresent them — especially when they discover that ResearchGate will not take down the pages when asked. ResearchGate has also been criticized for failing to provide safeguards against "the dark side of academic writing", including such phenomena as fake publishers, "ghost journals", publishers with "predatory" publication feesand fake impact ratings.

It has also been criticized for copyright infringement of published works. In Septemberlawyers representing the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers STM sent a letter to ResearchGate threatening legal action against them for copyright infringement and demanding them to alter their handling of uploaded articles to include pre-release checking for copyright violations and "Specifically, [for ResearchGate to] end its extraction of content from hosted articles and the modification of any hosted content, including any and all metadata.

It would also mean an end to Researchgate's own copying and downloading of published journal article content and the creation of internal databases of articles. ResearchGate has managed to achieve an agreement on article uploading with three other major publishers, Springer NatureCambridge University Press and Thieme.Our search results are now being sent to the WHO COVID Database external icon to make it easier for them to be searched, downloaded, and used by researchers worldwide.

Materials listed in these guides are selected to provide awareness of quality public health literature and resources.

You can search the database of citations by author, keyword in title, author, abstract, subject headings fieldsjournal, or abstract when available. Some of the research included above is preliminary. Materials listed in this database are selected to provide awareness of quality public health literature and resources. Once you have your EndNote file downloaded, to get the full-text of journal articles listed in the search results you can do the following steps:.

The following databases were searched from Dec. Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link. Stephen B. Thacker CDC Library. Section Navigation. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Syndicate. Minus Related Pages. This database was last updated on October 9, This series, the first of its kind for a CDC emergency response, provides brief summaries of new COVIDrelated studies on many topics, including epidemiology, clinical treatment and management, laboratory science, and modeling.

These summaries are released every Tuesday and Friday. Our new search results are now being sent to the WHO COVID Database external icon to make it easier for them to be searched, downloaded, and used by researchers worldwide.

Accessing the Full Text. Email Address. What's this? Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.

You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link. CDC is not responsible for Section compliance accessibility on other federal or private website. Cancel Continue.I have been on the phone this morning urging all my friends to go there.

Everything in the tour was absolutely perfect from the transfer arrangements to the car and hotel accommodations and the tour format itself. I would highly recommend it to anyone. Thank you very much for all that you did to make this part of our holiday so enjoyable - even the weather cooperated. Bjarni was excellent, thorough, and very responsive. He picked a superb hotel in Oslo (Continental) which spoiled us for the next leg of our vacation in Germany.

Luggage transfer from Flom to Oslo was a great idea and worked very well - thanks again, Bjarni. I have already recommended Nordic Visitor to several fellow travelers and would definitely use your services again.

Overall this experience massively exceeded my expectations. I will be leaving many reviews as soon as possible and will absolutely use this company again. I am telling all my friends about the excellent service and value i got from my tour with Nordic Visitor. Kerr Wintergill was my travel guide. I was very lucky to get such a knowledgeable guide. I am proud to say i can call him my friend, and when i return i will ask for him by name.

You were lifesavers when I was traveling to a new country and didn't know what to expect. You made it easy so I could relax and have fun. Dagny was helpful, the tour was great, and I knew I could call you if I had any problems. We wouldn't have seen nearly as much without Dagney's recommendations. Nordic Visitor was a 'lucky find' for us.

We found the Nordic Visitor website by chance while looking for 'Iceland tours', and upon further research, noted that the company's services had received very good reviews, so we decided to call them up. We prefer to travel on our own and at our own pace, and having a company available which has had considerable experience with the destination in question was extremely helpful.

Given the quality of the services (car, hotels, excursions) available, we feel we the trip was a great value, and was money well spent.

We received great support both before and during our trip, and we were really impressed with the quality and detail of the travel materials we received upon arrival. The specificity, clarity of instructions, and additional suggestions provided in the tour booklet created specifically for our trip and excursions, was very good, and really helped make the trip easier so we could focus on the enjoying the journey. We feel the staff at Nordic Visitor did a really great job for us. We are two busy professionals who love to travel.

researchgate articles date

Without a doubt, we will be in touch with Nordic Visitor again. We have nothing but fond memories of our trip. Overall, the trip was just amazing. Everything was very well organised. Nothing was too much trouble for Helga.

Replies to “Researchgate articles date”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *