Arguments against gay marriage essays

In the debate over gay marriage, opponents have many arguments that profess their belief that it should not be legal. These include many moral and religious reasons that point to a threat to the sacred institution of marriage. This debate brings up many questions.

Argumentative Essay on Gay Marriage

In an attempt to understand the issue, let's examine common arguments against same-sex marriage and why they may not stand up in modern America. Is there even a point to same-sex couples getting married? Why would they want to bother? Whether a marriage is between a man and a woman or two people of the same sex, the reasons behind getting married are the same.

arguments against gay marriage essays

There are, of course, the legal, property, and financial benefits of being married. These include the right of one partner to make medical decisions for the other and the joint ownership of a home or other property. Married couples can also handle their financial affairs, from banking to taxes, jointly. It may include children or be the couple on their own. Either way, a marriage certificate is the foundation of a family unit and this is extremely important to many people.

Opponents of marriage equality usually insist that marriage is only legitimate when it's between a man and a woman. Where does that leave people who are not quite either male or female - at least according to the definitions ordinarily employed? Defining marriage in terms of sex begs the question of how we define a person's sex in the first place. What is a "man" and what is a "woman"?

Using strict terminology, there are people for whom marriage to anyone might be permanently denied. Almost every opponent to gay marriage tends to rely on the belief that marriage is essentially and necessarily a religious rite.

For them, marriage is conceived of almost exclusively in religious terms.

arguments against gay marriage essays

This means that gay marriage amounts to a form a sacrilege, not to mention an intrusion of the state into a religious matter. It's true that religion has traditionally played a role in sanctifying marriages. In the end, this belief is simply incorrect. The contract of marriage is also a compact between two individuals, a promise to care for one another. Marriage has never been dependent on a single religion and is, instead, a result of human desire which is supported by the community as a whole.

For this reason, marriage is far more a civil right than it is a religious rite. Closely connected with the idea that marriage is necessarily religious is the belief that marriage is sacred or even a type of sacrament. This argument is rarely made explicit.

For and Against of Gay Marriage

This is perhaps one of the most important and fundamental arguments for opponents of gay marriage. It seems to lie at the heart of almost all of their other arguments. It also motivates much of their vehemence in a way that would be hard to explain otherwise.Please check the sample of the previously written essay on the topic. We are sure we can handle writing a new unique essay on this topic within the tight deadlines.

No plagiarism and custom research is guaranteed. As marriage institution was adopted to grant some rights to those who choose to share their livesthe next issue raised by gay marriage discussion is the equality of rights Since most legislature is adopted and amended with the purpose to guarantee the equality of rights to the population of the country considering this legislaturerefusal to legalize gay marriages can be seen as a discrimination act which deprives homosexuals who would enter into such a union of some of the rights provided to heterosexual couples among these are pensionsallowances for spousesetc.

Paper Topic: Gay Marriage p Gay MarriageThe issue of gay marriage has been a hot topic for the past several yearsespecially after a law allowing same-sex marriages together with a law allowing one-gender couples to adopt children came into force in the Netherlands. It is actually the emphasis on equal rights that helped gays and lesbians in The Netherlands to win the struggle for gay marriages Of coursemost obvious and commonly used argument against gay marriages is that it is against Biblical teachings.

There are many aspects to the discussionbut it seems to me that it is only a matter of time before gay marriage becomes legally recognized as a civil marriage in most countries. It seems to me that the issue here is not so much the ability of a couple to bear a child as their ability to actually raiseeducatecare and provide for the child. Thusreligious aspect of the discussion is very personal and somewhat irrelevant Another argument against gay marriage is the one that says that such a union cannot produce their own children.

Moreoverconstitutions of most civilized countries protect the freedom of religion which basically means that a person chooses which religion to believe in as well as which religion not to live by.

Recent studies of the subjectas well as psychological researchshow that same-sex couples are as able of being good parents meaning educatorsprotectors and love-giving adultsas heterosexual marriages. Howeverin our days there are many ways to get pregnant for women or for men to give their sperm to females wanting a childand thusbecome step-parents.

Gay Marriage Sample essay paragraphs Please check the sample of the previously written essay on the topic. Testimonials Never thought I would go for ordering online written essays. But I did. I am very happy that I found your professional writing and editing team. Michelle, VA.For many years now, same-sex marriage has been a controversial topic.

While some countries have legalized the practice, others still consider it not right and treat it as illegal. Same-sex marriage is defined as a marriage or union between two people of the same sex, such as a man and a man. Some countries have broadened their perspective on this issue even though for many years, it has never been legally acknowledged, with some societies even considering it a taboo.

Irrespective of any arguments, same-sex marriage should be legal because it is a fundamental human right. First, same-sex marriage, if recognized by society, provides legal rights protection to same sex couples on such matters as taxes, finances, and health care. If people live together in a homosexual relationship without being legally married, they do not enjoy the security to protect what they have worked for and saved together.

Legalizing same-sex unions would cushion homosexual partners from such unfortunate situations. They would have the right to become heirs to their spouses and enjoy tax breaks just like heterosexual married couples. Legalization would also make it possible for them to purchase properties together, open joint accounts, and sign documents together as couples.

10 Common Arguments Used by Opponents of Gay Marriage

Same sex marriage also allows two people in love to become one in a matrimonial union and live happily together. Denying homosexual couples the right to marry is thus denying them the right to be in love just like heterosexuals do. Moreover, the definition of marriage does not suggest that it should only be an exclusive union between two people of opposite sexes.

According to Gerstmannmarriage is a formally or legally recognized union between two people in a personal relationship. As per this definition, people should be allowed to marry once they are in love with each other irrespective of their genders. Reducing marriage to a union between a man and woman is thus a direct infringement into the rights of homosexuals. Additionally, gay marriages give homosexual couples the right to start families.

Just like heterosexual couples, gay and lesbian partners should be allowed to start families and have their own children. Essentially, a family should ideally have parents and children and it is not necessary that the parents be a male and female. Same sex partners can easily adopt and bring up children if their marriage is legalized and recognized by the society in which they live Gerstmann, Two different arguments have been provided in this article.

The first argument is against same-sex marriage as highlighted by Tim Drooling. Together with the organization that he leads, Canadians against same Sex Marriage, they claim that legalizing same-sex marriage will lead to worse situations such as incest, bestiality, and polygamy.

The second premise supports legalizing same-sex marriage as a matter of equality and not polygamy. The author concludes that despite the negativities of polygamy, it has been legalized and this should be the same case for gay marriage.

In my opinion, the author has presented a congruent argument in support of legalizing gay marriage. One of the premises in this article is that gay marriage would lead to polygamy and as such, should not be legalized. From the analysis of this premise, it is clear that Tim Drooling and his team use polygamy to explain why traditional or cultural marriages would collapse in the society.

However, what these individuals fail to understand is that polygamy has existed for many years. It existed during biblical times, and it also existed during historical times after the Bible era. During this time, polygamy was regarded as a form of marriage. Over the years, arguments against polygamy increased, and it was changed to monogamy.

For example, one man was allowed to marry many women. Today, in most societies, one man marries one woman and it is considered to be normal. As a result, it cannot be argued that same-sex marriage will ruin the concept of marriage.

It had already been ruined even before the legalization of same-sex marriage. The second argument against gay marriage in this article regards the effects of same-sex marriage on the bearing and upbringing of children. One of the goals of traditional marriages is to have children. If the arguments related to polygamy and monogamy are considered, it would mean that same-sex marriage should be legalized even if they encourage polygamy. As a matter of fact, individuals in a polygamous relationship are more likely to fulfill the goal of bearing children as opposed to those in a monogamous marriage.

This is the same case for individuals in a heterosexual relationship. Advances in technology have allowed individuals of the same sex to have children and even raise them. Therefore, the claim of the author that children can thrive in a gay home is right. Allowing polygamy in same-sex marriages would give children a more positive experience as compared to monogamy or heterosexual marriages.

Polygamy can thus not be used as a reason to oppose same-sex marriage. Another premise in the article is that one of the effects of legalizing same-sex marriage is incest. Just like incest is an unnatural activity in the society, homosexuality has been considered in the same way.

The society opposed polygamy as it was also considered to be unnatural for one man to marry many women. It is what led to the wide spread of monogamy. Today, there have been claims that it is unnatural for one man to marry one woman. This has raised different debates regarding the eligibility of monogamy and polygamy. For example, individuals have referred to biblical times in arguing for polygamy instead of monogamy. The same arguments that are raised in support of polygamy can also apply in arguing against same-sex marriage.

Therefore, it is difficult for one to support polygamy and fail to support the legalization of same-sex marriage. Society members have disregarded polygamy due to claims that it has serious negative effects on individuals. For example, it can lead to sexual subjugation.Gay marriage has been a critical topic in many countries since Around the yearcountries such as America and the UK started approving gay marriages, although not everyone agreed with this decision.

Still inhomosexuals are fighting for their right to get married to someone of their same sex. People against gay marriage feel that if it was to be legalized, the importance of marriage would fade away and some people would refer to marriage in a different way. According to an article from the Human Rights Campaign, there is nothing wrong with allowing homosexuals to have the same rights as those who are heterosexual. Every individual person should have equal rights, regardless of sexuality.

Gay marriage should be legalized in all states and countries, as it has been held off for too long. There are several reasons why homosexuals feel that they want to be married legally.

One important reason is that they want to legally show their love for each other by having a marriage license. They are in love and want to spend their lives with a person of their same sex, but to do this officially they need the law to approve.

There is no reason why two people cannot get married because of their sexuality. However, people may argue that there are other ways for same-sex couples to be legally tied together without getting married. One option would be by going through a civil union, although it is true that civil unions and marriages are totally different things.

Ways have already begun to be altered amongst some countries and states, now it is time for the rest to follow and do the same. Furthermore, another reason why same-sex couples should be allowed the right to marry is so they can have a chance to be happy like any other couple.

If an individual is unable to marry the person they want, they will not be satisfied. One does not become homosexual, one is born homosexual. So why not allow them to marry a person they truly care for and live the life they want, which would actually mean getting married. One of the many controversial topics regarding same-sex marriage is that it goes against religious beliefs. It is true, though, that if two people of the same gender want to marry, it does not require any religions to make the ceremony take place.

Also, people should think about divorce if thinking about marriages. Many people believe marriage is special and should occur when two people feel they are soul mates.Both in the U.

Accordingly, more and more people are starting to acknowledge the flawed nature of all arguments which oppose the legalization of same-sex marriage. This article discusses 10 of the most common positions presented by opponents of marriage equality and outlines why each deserves a failing grade. The most basic argument presented by gay marriage opponents purports that marriage between two people of the same sex is "not natural" and is in violation of the "natural order.

In reality, marriage is a societal institution.

arguments against gay marriage essays

The natural world didn't create marriage, humans did. Nature-themed arguments against gay marriage say little about the societal institution of marriage but reveal a lot about the homophobia and heterosexism of those who present such arguments. In this regard, the disapproval isn't about gay marriage per se -- it's more about discomfort with homosexuality, period.

With the procreation argument, opponents of equality argue that the institution of marriage is essentially in place to assist with procreation and the raising of children. They reason that because two people of the same sex cannot procreate that they should not be allowed to marry.

While the production of children may indeed be a feature of many heterosexual marriages the capacity to procreate does not determine the legal validity of such marriages.

There are many married straight couples who cannot biologically have children or who choose not to. The procreation argument ignores the fact that people marry for a wide range of reasons unrelated to procreation including love, friendship and companionship. References to the Bible, the "sinful" nature of homosexuality, and "religious beliefs" are regularly made by those who seek to rationalize their support of discrimination via religion. Marriage is a religious institution, they argue, and not one for society to tamper with.

Given that the U. In order to legally marry there is absolutely no requirement for a religious ceremony to be held. In this sense, marriage is not a religious institution but a socio-legal one governed by the state.

Religious beliefs about marriage should never be enshrined in laws in ways that restrict the freedom of others who do not share those beliefs. Opponents argue that marriage has always been between a man and a woman and that it should stay that way. They say that efforts to legalize same-sex marriage will fundamentally alter the institution for the worse.

History reveals, however, that marriage laws in the U. There was a time when women were the legal property of their husbands.

There was a time when a man and a woman of different races couldn't marry each other. There was even a time when not one country in the world had legalized same-sex marriage! Removing discrimination from the institution of marriage does not redefine "marriage" -- it simply makes the institution more accessible and reflects the evolution of society.

With roots in religion, the sanctity argument posits that marriage is a "sacred" institution that only heterosexual couples should have access to. Allowing same-sex couples to marry apparently poses a "threat" to "traditional marriage" as though somehow heterosexual married couples will all be at risk of divorcing when two people of the same sex marry each other.

If those who use the "sanctity" argument were genuinely concerned about the institution of marriage they'd focus their efforts on helping those straight married couples who are at risk of divorcing.

If marriage was so "sacred" they'd also be pursuing the outlawing of heterosexual divorce.

Ted Cruz Slams Supreme Court's Gay Marriage Decision - TODAY

They do neither of these things. The only married straight couples impacted by the legalization of gay marriage are those in which one of the parties is a closet-case gay person who dreams of coming out and marrying someone of the same sex! Opponents of equality frequently make use of flawed research studies to insinuate that allowing same-sex couples to marry will somehow harm children.

They argue that children need a "mom and a dad" in order to flourish in life and that legalizing same-sex marriage denies children this opportunity of "normalcy. There is no evidence that children are psychologically harmed by having two dads or two moms.

Some opponents of marriage equality describe a future in which religious people become the new "victims" of oppression. They talk of charity-based religious organizations being "forced out of business" for "sticking to their beliefs" about marriage. In this reverse scenario, gay people are apparently "hateful" for wanting to be treated equally in society. How dare we demand equal rights and criticize those who discriminate against us!Same-sex marriages is a union that takes place between two people who belong to the same social gender or similar biological sex.

Gays share a common characteristic and lifestyle, since they are attracted to individuals of the same sex. Gays are men who are sexually attracted to other males, thus practicing homosexuality.

In fact, many people consider gay relationship to be of lesser harm than that of heterosexuals. The question, debate and politics of same-sex marriages have been in the public domain for quite a long time in the United States. This has seen the emergence of two schools of thought, namely the proponents of same-sex marriages, who generally include gays and gays and their opponents.

Many opponents of gays are always concerned with how and where same-sex marriage couples get their children. This also raises the controversial question of test tube babies, which is heavily criticized for degrading basic human values.

Same-sex couples in the US go to such extremes in an attempt to get their own children, and these desperate measures can be said to be the cause of their opposition. In this regard, William J. Bennett puts opposes gay marriages, because of moral reasons.

Moreover, Andrew Sullivan argued that:. It provides role models for young gay people, who, after exhilaration of coming out, can easily lapse into short term relationships and insecurity with no tangible goal in sight. It is evident from this statement that Andrew Sullivan supports gay marriage, but he asserts the idea that this form of union should be legalized to reduce relationship insecurity gaps.

The reason why William Bennett rejected same-sex marriages is because he defined marriage as a legal and religious commitment between a man and a woman, and thus many are not able to accept same-sex marriages.

Therefore, it can be argued that denying them legal marriage means that their religious freedom is denied since no one should be forced into a particular religious belief. Therefore, they should be allowed. The proponents of same-sex marriages argue that nobody should be hurt by a marriage of two people.

arguments against gay marriage essays

Marriage is considered to be more than just a legal status, as it involves several issues that affect individuals, for instance, inheritance rights Sullivan A critical medical decision that might need an immediate family member or a spouse to approve denies same-sex marriage couples the opportunity to be considered a legal union.

This puts the gay or gays in a difficult situation, since it is against societal norms and cultural values for the same-sex proponents to demand legal recognition. In fact, the current economic situation requires help and support from both the husband and wife, that is, sharing household utility bills. Just like those who are married, same-sex couples need to support each other in difficult times, thus it becomes absolutely necessary that they are legally bound as husband and wife.

Therefore, it should send a clear message to those who are opposed to same-sex marriages to understand their humanity. In conclusion, the fact that gays are denied an opportunity to legalize their marriage means that a minority group of individuals is being discriminated against, which is a violation of respect for the rights of a minority group in the US. This means that same-sex couples file joint tax returns back to the state.

Since this revenue goes towards funding the government budget expenditure, it is not fair for the federal government to refuse to legalize same-sex marriages. The bureaucracy that same-sex couples have to go through is not always justified.

It is a tedious, time-consuming and discriminatory process, since couples are required to fill out many forms. This discourages same-sex marriages, and the federal government should take into account that these people are law-abiding citizens who remit their taxes without fail. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. If you continue, we will assume that you agree to our Cookies Policy.

For and Against of Gay Marriage Words: Topic: Sociology. Check the price of your paper. Confucius and Other Philosophers Role in China. Dog' and Human Baby' Raising. If you continue, we will assume that you agree to our Cookies Policy OK.


Replies to “Arguments against gay marriage essays”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *